The problem you're facing
Your infrastructure spread itself despite you: some legacy on-premise, public cloud by necessity, and data moving between the two by makeshift means. Each environment has its own monitoring, rules and gaps : and nobody sees the whole.
Our answer
We design hybrid deliberately: which workload goes where, why, and how environments communicate. Private inter-site networking, unified monitoring, homogeneous security and a failover plan. Hybrid stops being an accident of history: it becomes an architecture.
What LaMeDuSe takes care of
- Workload mapping and constraints
- Target hybrid architecture: private, public, on-premise
- Secure interconnection between environments (VPN, interconnect)
- Unified monitoring and logging
- Homogeneous security policy across all environments
- Documented failover and burst plan
- Single administration for the whole
Our methodology
- 1
Requirements study
Security, compliance, sovereignty, performance and cost: constraints drive the architecture, not the other way round.
- 2
Target architecture
Architecture diagram, sizing, addressing plan and backup strategy documented before the first deployment.
- 3
Progressive rollout
Staged implementation with validation at each step, workload migration and recovery tests.
- 4
Operations & optimisation
Monitoring, capacity management, cost optimisation and planned evolutions.
Relevant technologies
Security
Environment isolation, encryption at rest and in transit, granular access control and centralised logging.
Hosting & infrastructure
Our own cloud operates from datacenters in France, Germany and Switzerland : a sovereign alternative to US hyperscalers.
Maintenance
Continuous monitoring, planned update cycles and the ability to scale without rebuilding.
Why LaMeDuSe
We operate hybrid naturally: our own European private cloud, AWS environments at clients, and on-premise. All three are monitored from the same tools : because we administer them every day.
Frequently asked questions
Technically, yes : that's the price of freedom of choice. But complexity is manageable: standard interconnection, unified monitoring, single administration. And the complexity of a badly-sized single cloud often costs more.
Through encrypted links (site-to-site VPN or dedicated interconnect), with documented and controlled flows. Every flow has a reason, an owner and monitoring : no movement by default.
Starting rule: sensitive and stable on private, burst and specific services on public, low-value legacy on-premise. Then refinement per workload based on costs, latency and compliance.
Yes: audit of the existing, flow mapping, then a clean-up plan : securing interconnections, unifying monitoring, and moving misplaced workloads.